Nation-Building >> Breaking: N. Korea Targeted Hawaii | return to front page

"America has two great dominant strands of political thought - conservatism, which, at its very best, draws lines that should not be crossed; and progressivism, which, at its very best, breaks down barriers that should never have been erected." -- Bill Clinton, Dedication of the Clinton Presidential Library, November 2004

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes

website stats

Previous Posts
Netflix, Inc.
ThinkGeek T-Shirts will make you cool!
illy coffee - 2 cans, 2 mugs for just $26.

Thursday, July 06, 2006


Breaking: N. Korea Targeted Hawaii

posted by Tim Saler at Thursday, July 06, 2006 permalink View blog reactions
From Reuters,

TOKYO (Reuters) - A North Korean missile launched on Wednesday was aimed at an area of the ocean close to Hawaii, a Japanese newspaper reported on Friday.

Experts estimated the Taepodong-2 ballistic missile to have a range of up to 6,000 km, putting Alaska within its reach. Wednesday's launch apparently failed shortly after take-off and the missile landed in the sea between the Korean peninsula and Japan, a few hundred kilometres from the launch pad.

But data from U.S. and Japanese Aegis radar-equipped destroyers and surveillance aircraft on the missile's angle of take-off and altitude indicated that it was heading for waters near Hawaii, the Sankei Shimbun reported, citing multiple sources in the United States and Japan.

More information will be posted as it becomes available, but at least at this early stage it appears that the technological failure of the Taepo Dong-2 missile may have averted war. A successful attempt by North Korea to fire a missile at Hawaii, landing just short of land, would be nothing short of an act of war.

Read on...

Would we accept it if the North Koreans flew fighter jets or bombers into American airspace but did not attack a target? It is unlikely, and it should be equally unlikely that we would accept an attempt by the North Koreans to fire a missile into Hawaiian waters.

I have at no point prior to this been an explicit supporter of military retaliation against North Korea, but let it it be said: if they fire another Taepo Dong-2 missile at Alaska, Hawaii, or even the continental West Coast, I will consider it an act of war.



Feeling pretty militaristic there? "Waters near/close" to Hawaii could mean just off shore, but more likely, means between 3-200 miles away - also known as international waters. Which, while reckless, isn't a violation of US airspace in any way - just like it isn't a violation for the US to conduct "naval exercises" just off the coast of Iran from time to time.


If it's not international waters, if it's American territory then I will consider it an act of war.


Listen, don't try and sugarcoat the obvious... North Korea hates the US and if they were to fire a missle toward Hawaii, they are either trying to hit Hawaii or trying to provoke a response from the US. I live in Hawaii and am seriously thinking about moving now.


Post a Comment


View blog top tags
The Assault on Reason

Obama 2008 - I want my country back

I want my country back - Obama 2008

About Nation-Building

Nation-Building was founded by Aziz Poonawalla in August 2002 under the name Dean Nation. Dean Nation was the very first weblog devoted to a presidential candidate, Howard Dean, and became the vanguard of the Dean netroot phenomenon, raising over $40,000 for the Dean campaign, pioneering the use of Meetup, and enjoying the attention of the campaign itself, with Joe Trippi a regular reader (and sometime commentor). Howard Dean himself even left a comment once. Dean Nation was a group weblog effort and counts among its alumni many of the progressive blogsphere's leading talent including Jerome Armstrong, Matthew Yglesias, and Ezra Klein. After the election in 2004, the blog refocused onto the theme of "purple politics", formally changing its name to Nation-Building in June 2006. The primary focus of the blog is on articulating purple-state policy at home and pragmatic liberal interventionism abroad.