Nation-Building >> Feingold | return to front page

"America has two great dominant strands of political thought - conservatism, which, at its very best, draws lines that should not be crossed; and progressivism, which, at its very best, breaks down barriers that should never have been erected." -- Bill Clinton, Dedication of the Clinton Presidential Library, November 2004

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes

website stats

Previous Posts
Netflix, Inc.
ThinkGeek T-Shirts will make you cool!
illy coffee - 2 cans, 2 mugs for just $26.

Monday, April 04, 2005

 

Feingold http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7326869/

posted by Aziz P. at Monday, April 04, 2005 permalink View blog reactions
can someone explain to me Feingold's appeal? (paging Brian) I am not skeptical, just ignorant. Well, I am also more conservative than most liberals (while firmly associating myself to the liberal label, of course), which is probably why I am leaning Hillary if anything. I just want to hear a case for Feingold on its merits rather than "He's Zaphod Beeblebrox, baby!!" rock star kind of thing.

 


Discussion

Well, I'm not sure how he would do in a national campaign, which is why I'm not willing to become a 2008 cheerleader yet (I also haven't fully assessed the other candidates), but I think he does personify some of the attempts to bridge the red/blue divide we talk about here. He's skilled at pitching liberal ideas in a largely rural midwestern state, and has a hometown appeal most Rhodes scholar types lose. In WI, he also has the reputation of a man of principle because of issues like the Patriot Act and his refusal to take soft money.

 

the one thing I've learned though is that when you run a candidate based on a single quality, that quality gets tarnished. Kerry a war hero? Enter teh swift Liars.

Feingold a man of principle? Well, he just set up a PAC. Let the accusations of hypocrite begin.

I don't like the idea of running a candidate based on a single defining trait. Its just too tempting a target.

 

before i became dean-conscious back in late 2002 i wanted senator feingold to run. a quick list of why:

* deficit hawk (e.g. paygo)
* strong civil libertarian streak (e.g. anti PATRIOT act)
* great environmental record
* independent minded
* anti death penalty

he's definitely a say what he means, means what he says type of politician.

New Jersey for Feingold - www.njforfeingold.org

 

The only Senate vote against the USA Patriot act. Frankly, that's all I need to know about the guy.

Cheers -

 

an aside re: abde's comment on Feingold setting up a PAC.

here is Feingold's page from opensecrets. Feingold's '04 campaign was funded just over 90% from private contributions, 93% with full disclosure. Financially, he's pretty clean.

Cheers -

 

Seems to have his prioities in order. Am looking at him and Bayh as my 08 candidates.

 

Hey I just love your blog. I also have a adult dating services
blog/site. I mostly deals with adult dating services
Please come and check it out if you get the time!

 

Post a Comment

Archives

View blog top tags
The Assault on Reason

Obama 2008 - I want my country back

I want my country back - Obama 2008

About Nation-Building

Nation-Building was founded by Aziz Poonawalla in August 2002 under the name Dean Nation. Dean Nation was the very first weblog devoted to a presidential candidate, Howard Dean, and became the vanguard of the Dean netroot phenomenon, raising over $40,000 for the Dean campaign, pioneering the use of Meetup, and enjoying the attention of the campaign itself, with Joe Trippi a regular reader (and sometime commentor). Howard Dean himself even left a comment once. Dean Nation was a group weblog effort and counts among its alumni many of the progressive blogsphere's leading talent including Jerome Armstrong, Matthew Yglesias, and Ezra Klein. After the election in 2004, the blog refocused onto the theme of "purple politics", formally changing its name to Nation-Building in June 2006. The primary focus of the blog is on articulating purple-state policy at home and pragmatic liberal interventionism abroad.