The O-Blog sucked
A strong title, to be sure, but one that immediately leapt to my mind after reading Farhad Manjoo's excellent article in Salon on blogging (watch an ad for a day pass). Farhad mentions how at Dailykos, a Diarist (Zackpunk) wrote an excellent piece, which was Recommended, then Promoted, and ultimately ended up in Kerry's stump speech. That's the true power of Scoop as a system of community building that allows a campaign to skim the best of the ideas from the proverbial Chaos of participatory democracy.
That's a capability that Moveable Type, old technology that the Dean campagn's o-blog never graduated from, sorely lacks. Farhad asks:
Farhad is mistaken - Trippi may have taken thematic cues from the o-blog community, but to my knowledge never used any of our strategic advice. The o-blog was an echo chamber, where dissenting and critical voices were drowned out in a sea of raw enthusiasm. Here on the Dean blog, we were much more strident, and we as a sub-community within the larger Dean movement produced many excellent ideas that were never capitalized on. The best example is the "I am Howard Dean" Superbowl Ad idea, which I still think would have had a decisive impact, and would have been relatively cheap compared to the monetary outflow in the later stages of the campaign.
Had the Dean campaign listened to us more, things might have been different indeed - says Peter Beinart in TIME, "If Dean were the nominee, flip-flops wouldn't be the issue; Iraq would. The former Vermont Governor opposed the war from the start, and his rationale was as simple as Kerry's was convoluted: Saddam was not a threat."
We tried at Dean Nation to promote ideas from the comments (some good, some fanciful - see the Blimp), but we never had the resources to run Scoop. The Dean campaign DID have those resources, and had both Markos and Jerome on the payroll - but when they proposed Scoop, the campaign rejected the idea, prefering to stick with Moveable Type. The reason is clear: Scoop is too much "people power" and not "top down" enough. For all Joe's visionary rhetoric about bottoms-up democracy, Scoop was just too scary for what was essentially a classic old-fashioned campaign, managerially speaking.
I'm previewing my upcoming review of Trippi's book a bit here, but my general point is that the Dean campaign did not suffer from letting the inmates run the asylum. It suffered from not believeing in itself - and the inmates - enough to let them take over. When the campaign became too conservative in its approach, too wedded to the intoxicating fandom at the o-blog instead of the constructive criticism here at Dean Nation, it lost the reins of the powerful force that drove it.
As Daily Kos proves, and Salon recognizes, there's more to this Net Roots thing than just fund raising. Sadly, the Dean campaign never realized it. At least Kerry gets it now, somewhat...
BTW, here's llamasonic's original Dean Blimp page.
That's a capability that Moveable Type, old technology that the Dean campagn's o-blog never graduated from, sorely lacks. Farhad asks:
In the Dean campaign, Trippi and other advisors professed to rely on the readers of the official Howard Dean blog for at least some strategic advice; we'll never know if this advice ultimately helped Dean, propelling him to a position that he never would have attained without help from the bloggers, or whether, in the end, the cultish Deaniac movement drove people away from Dean and did in his candidacy.
Farhad is mistaken - Trippi may have taken thematic cues from the o-blog community, but to my knowledge never used any of our strategic advice. The o-blog was an echo chamber, where dissenting and critical voices were drowned out in a sea of raw enthusiasm. Here on the Dean blog, we were much more strident, and we as a sub-community within the larger Dean movement produced many excellent ideas that were never capitalized on. The best example is the "I am Howard Dean" Superbowl Ad idea, which I still think would have had a decisive impact, and would have been relatively cheap compared to the monetary outflow in the later stages of the campaign.
Had the Dean campaign listened to us more, things might have been different indeed - says Peter Beinart in TIME, "If Dean were the nominee, flip-flops wouldn't be the issue; Iraq would. The former Vermont Governor opposed the war from the start, and his rationale was as simple as Kerry's was convoluted: Saddam was not a threat."
We tried at Dean Nation to promote ideas from the comments (some good, some fanciful - see the Blimp), but we never had the resources to run Scoop. The Dean campaign DID have those resources, and had both Markos and Jerome on the payroll - but when they proposed Scoop, the campaign rejected the idea, prefering to stick with Moveable Type. The reason is clear: Scoop is too much "people power" and not "top down" enough. For all Joe's visionary rhetoric about bottoms-up democracy, Scoop was just too scary for what was essentially a classic old-fashioned campaign, managerially speaking.
I'm previewing my upcoming review of Trippi's book a bit here, but my general point is that the Dean campaign did not suffer from letting the inmates run the asylum. It suffered from not believeing in itself - and the inmates - enough to let them take over. When the campaign became too conservative in its approach, too wedded to the intoxicating fandom at the o-blog instead of the constructive criticism here at Dean Nation, it lost the reins of the powerful force that drove it.
As Daily Kos proves, and Salon recognizes, there's more to this Net Roots thing than just fund raising. Sadly, the Dean campaign never realized it. At least Kerry gets it now, somewhat...
BTW, here's llamasonic's original Dean Blimp page.
Comments