Pat Tillman

By Anonymous -
How we as a nation deal with the death of former NFL safety Pat Tillman will probably determine who wins this election.

Tillman volunteered for Special Forces after 9-11, turning down a $3.6 million contract to serve his country. He was killed while with his brother on patrol in Afghanistan.

Announcing his death, an ESPN announcer said Tillman died "weeding out remnants of the Taliban in Afghanistan." There are some terrible lies in that sentence fragment. Tillman wasn't gardening. The Taliban consists of far more than remnants -- they control most of the countryside. Had we finished the job in Afghanistan two years ago, instead of getting distracted by Iraq, Tillman might not have been there this week.

But we know what the neocons will do with this. They will use Tillman's death to tie Afghanistan and Iraq together. They will use him as a piece of propaganda. They are already doing that. Some comments from the far-right Little Green Footballs:

I wonder what Kos and Indymedia will spew about Tillman's death?

If only the usual suspects on the Left loved American a hundredth as much as he did...

if (when) the DUmmies and/or indymedia designate this MAN as a "merc", may I suggest we pay them a visit en masse?

Pat sacrificed his life so the likes of Michael Moore can have the freedom to chortle about what kind of a chump Pat must have been.

There is a "rally round the flag" instinct when your side takes casualties, no matter the cause. Pat Tillman was a great man fighting in a just war. We can't forget that, even as we mourn other, equally-great, less-famous men (and women) dieing in a needless war of choice that denied Tillman, and those he served with, the reinforcements and material needed to get their job done.

Let's just remember the game here. We have a strategy for winning this war. It involves de-Americanizing Iraq, getting back together with our allies, fighting the war of ideas, living up to our creed again, and using water (not fire) to fight fire.

Why are we still in Afghanistan? Because Bush didn't finish the job. That's why Pat Tillman is dead. That's why his brother is still in the line of fire. That's more nuanced than the right's answer, "kill them all," but focusing on that truth is our nation's only hope of winning the War on Terror.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A fair solution to Jerusalem

By Aziz P. -
I remember reading one of the books by Tom Clancy in which Jack Ryan was credited with coming up with a solution for Middle East peace which was pointedly never actually detailed in the novel. It was just a way to give his character some foreign policy cred, but ended up like that mysterious suitcase in Pulp Fiction. I couldn't help but be reminded of that, though, when I read former New York mayor Ed Koch's innovative solution to resolving the status of Jerusalem . Instead of putting the hot-button issue of Jerusalem last on the agenda, the issue should be addressed first. If the Jerusalem question is solved, everything else should fall into place more easily. I believe there is a way to keep Jerusalem unified. I am talking not only of the old walled city, which is a very small part of the city of Jerusalem, but the whole city, east, west, north and south. [...] My suggestion is to situate the new Palestinian capital in that part of East Jerusalem that is occupied overwhelming...
Read more

Conservatism's shari'a, liberalism's ijtihad

By Aziz P. -
An interesting meta-debate by intellectual conservatives over conservatism's future is playing out. It started with David Frum's Waterloo essay, which led to his political excommunication. Julian Sanchez observed that this represented an epistemic closing of the conservative mind , a thesis that was validated by the retribution visited upon Jim Manzi for daring to suggest that conservatives will achieve more persuasion by using honest, strong arguments instead of weak, emotional ones. All of this has led John Quiggin at Crooked Timber to argue most wisely that as conservatism implodes, liberalism needs to find its own rationale that is more than just "not conservatism". Quiggin has a list of priorities for the liberal movement to address, and closes with the general plea, ...the left has to stand for something more than keeping the existing order afloat with incremental improvements. We need to offer the hope of a better world as an alternative to the angry tribali...
Read more